Israel's Asymmetric Wars / The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy (PDF)

SAMY COHEN is Senior Research Fellow at CERI (Centre for International Studies and Research) Sciences Po, Paris, France.

"An important and critical analysis of Israel s asymmetrical warfare against the Palestinians since its inception in 1948. The author rejects claims that Israel has used state terror or intentionally targeted civilians as did other states, such as Russia or France, when conducting counterinsurgencies. Rather, he critiques the IDF for ignoring the basic rules of asymmetrical warfare: namely, to use minimum force, dissociate civilians from combatants, and seek to change hearts and minds. This is an important book for anyone interested in asymmetrical conflicts. It provides both a thoughtful examination of Israeli strategy and a balanced analysis of the causes for its failure." - Yoram Peri, Abraham S. and Jack Kay Professor in Israel Studies, Director of the Gildenhorn Institute for Israel Studies, University of Maryland

"Long regarded as the only true manifestation of political pluralism in the Middle East, Israel has long taken pride in an army that has secured the state amid a wider Arab animus for over six decades. But while its reputation as the region s most formidable military machine has been forged in over six conventional wars, it has been the involvement in low intensity conflict that has shaped the combat experience of the Israel Defence Force (IDF) over the last twenty five years. From combating PLO guerrillas in the late 1960s to Operation Cast Lead in Gaza in 2008/09, the IDF has probably has as much experience of asymmetric warfare as any other army in the democratic world. Yet unlike the experience of the United States military in Iraq and Afghanistan, it has singularly failed to develop over time a coherent counter-insurgency doctrine or indeed principles for conducting war among the people . Indeed, Israeli military operations have been defined by their kinetic intensity which, all too often, has relied on an application of firepower that is more suited to the conventional battlefield in its intensity and destructive power.

In this