Apprehension and Argument
Ancient Theories of Starting Points for Knowledge
(Sprache: Englisch)
This book offers the first synoptic study of how the primary elements in knowledge structures were analysed in antiquity from Plato to late ancient commentaries. It argues that, in the Platonic-Aristotelian tradition, the question of starting points was...
Leider schon ausverkauft
versandkostenfrei
Buch
186.99 €
- Lastschrift, Kreditkarte, Paypal, Rechnung
- Kostenlose Rücksendung
- Ratenzahlung möglich
Produktdetails
Produktinformationen zu „Apprehension and Argument “
Klappentext zu „Apprehension and Argument “
This book offers the first synoptic study of how the primary elements in knowledge structures were analysed in antiquity from Plato to late ancient commentaries. It argues that, in the Platonic-Aristotelian tradition, the question of starting points was treated from two distinct points of view: as a question of how we acquire basic knowledge; and as a question of the premises we may immediately accept in the line of argumentation.
Inhaltsverzeichnis zu „Apprehension and Argument “
From the contents:- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations and a Note on the Texts
- Introduction
Part I: Platonic-Aristotelian Tradition
1. Premises of Argumentation
2. Intellectual Apprehension
Part II: Alternative Approaches
3. Hellenistic Philosophy
- Conclusion. Bibliography. Index of Contents. Index of Names
- Index of Cited Texts
Bibliographische Angaben
- Autor: Miira Tuominen
- 2007, 344 Seiten, Maße: 16 x 24,1 cm, Gebunden, Englisch
- Verlag: Springer Netherlands
- ISBN-10: 1402050429
- ISBN-13: 9781402050428
- Erscheinungsdatum: 19.02.2007
Sprache:
Englisch
Rezension zu „Apprehension and Argument “
"[...] provides some extraordinary insights into classical philosophy, insights that may prove to be useful to scholars who are willing to put the effort into pursuing them. [...] a valuable book for scholars of argument and rhetoric who are motivated enough to cross disciplinary lines." (David Hoffman, CUNY Baruch College, in Argumentation and Advocacy 47:1, 2010)
Kommentar zu "Apprehension and Argument"
Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar zu "Apprehension and Argument".
Kommentar verfassen