Charlie Chaplin vs. America
When Art, Sex, and Politics Collided
(Sprache: Englisch)
The story of Charlie Chaplin's years of self-imposed exile from the United States, when he had become a pariah during the 1950s Red Scare. While living abroad he made his last, and by general agreement, worst films, only to return home years later to a triumphant reception.
Jetzt vorbestellen
versandkostenfrei
Buch (Gebunden)
38.00 €
- Lastschrift, Kreditkarte, Paypal, Rechnung
- Kostenlose Rücksendung
Produktdetails
Produktinformationen zu „Charlie Chaplin vs. America “
The story of Charlie Chaplin's years of self-imposed exile from the United States, when he had become a pariah during the 1950s Red Scare. While living abroad he made his last, and by general agreement, worst films, only to return home years later to a triumphant reception.
Klappentext zu „Charlie Chaplin vs. America “
The remarkable, must-read story of Charlie Chaplin's years of exile from the United States during the postwar Red Scare, and how it ruined his film career, from bestselling biographer Scott Eyman.Bestselling Hollywood biographer and film historian Scott Eyman tells the story of Charlie Chaplin's fall from grace. In the aftermath of World War Two, Chaplin was criticized for being politically liberal and internationalist in outlook. He had never become a US citizen, something that would be held against him as xenophobia set in when the postwar Red Scare took hold.
Politics aside, Chaplin had another problem: his sexual interest in young women. He had been married three times and had had numerous affairs. In the 1940s, he was the subject of a paternity suit, which he lost, despite blood tests that proved he was not the father. His sexuality became a convenient way for those who opposed his politics to condemn him. Refused permission to return to the US from a trip abroad, he settled in Switzerland, and made his last two films in London
In Charlie Chaplin vs. America, bestselling author Scott Eyman explores the life and times of the movie genius who brought us such masterpieces as City Lights and Modern Times. This is a perceptive, insightful portrait of Chaplin and of an America consumed by political turmoil.
Lese-Probe zu „Charlie Chaplin vs. America “
Prologue PROLOGUE In those days, nothing important happened on the weekends.
Movie people went to parties, to Palm Springs, or to clubs on the Sunset Strip. Occasionally they paired off in a way they couldn't during the week, when they had to get up before dawn in order to get to the studio by 8 a.m. And sometimes they just rested.
What this meant in practice was that a Monday gossip column was typically filled with soft items saved for a slow news day. Hedda Hopper's column for Monday, May 19, 1952, was a case in point: "Ava had a party of 10 to put Frankie in the groove at the Grove. And [photographer] Hymie Fink covered him from every angle.... Phil Yordan's 'Edgar' for the Detective Story screenplay was stolen from the detective bringing it to him by train. So Phil's hiring a detective to find it."
Hopper's lead item seemed to fit right in: "Charlie Chaplin has his return visa and he's all set for Europe in September for the preems of Limelight in London and Paris. Oona goes along, but the kids stay behind in Beverly."
In fact, the item was not a space-filler so much as one of those barely perceptible tremors that precedes an earthquake. A day or two after the item ran, Hopper sent a clipping in a letter addressed to California Senator Richard M. Nixon:
My dear Dick,
The enclosed about Charlie Chaplin is very distressing. He tried to leave the country a year or so ago and was told he couldn't get back in. I hope that situation has not changed. And if it has been changed and he has finagled through the State Department and has obtained a passport with re-entry, I believe it is the duty of each Senator to know about it.
Personally, I hope he goes and never comes back in. He is as bad a citizen as we have in this country, as you well know.
I hope you will look into this matter and do what you can about it.
For Nixon-or anybody else-Hopper was categorized as High Maintenance. She wrote Nixon dozens of letters of approval, as
... mehr
well as occasional scoldings when she felt that he came up short in attending to her needs. This invariably involved Nixon failing to placate her with a soothing "Dear Hedda" letter of reassurance about her vital contributions to their shared priorities.
On May 29, Nixon replied: "I agree with you that the way the Chaplin case has been handled has been a disgrace for years. Unfortunately, we aren't able to do too much about it when the top decisions are made by the likes of [Secretary of State Dean] Acheson and [Attorney General James] McGranery. You can be sure, however, that I will keep my eye on the case and possibly after January we will be able to work with an Administration which will apply the same rules to Chaplin as they do to ordinary citizens."
That paragraph aside, it's a chatty letter between old friends. Nixon discusses the upcoming Republican convention and the tactics being deployed by Robert Taft and Dwight Eisenhower, the two main candidates for the nomination. Hopper was ardently for Taft, and Nixon didn't disabuse her of the notion that he was as well, even though he would happily accept the vice presidential nomination from Eisenhower. Nixon had a hunch that the convention would not devolve into a destructive food fight. "I still think that we are going to come out of the Convention united behind a good candidate.
"Pat joins me in sending our best to you."
Nixon had been a member of the House Un-American Activities Committee whose hearings had shaken Hollywood to its core in 1947, with Hopper serving as a primary cheerleader. They were devout coreligionists in the fight against the social decay represented by Communism, not to mention unche
On May 29, Nixon replied: "I agree with you that the way the Chaplin case has been handled has been a disgrace for years. Unfortunately, we aren't able to do too much about it when the top decisions are made by the likes of [Secretary of State Dean] Acheson and [Attorney General James] McGranery. You can be sure, however, that I will keep my eye on the case and possibly after January we will be able to work with an Administration which will apply the same rules to Chaplin as they do to ordinary citizens."
That paragraph aside, it's a chatty letter between old friends. Nixon discusses the upcoming Republican convention and the tactics being deployed by Robert Taft and Dwight Eisenhower, the two main candidates for the nomination. Hopper was ardently for Taft, and Nixon didn't disabuse her of the notion that he was as well, even though he would happily accept the vice presidential nomination from Eisenhower. Nixon had a hunch that the convention would not devolve into a destructive food fight. "I still think that we are going to come out of the Convention united behind a good candidate.
"Pat joins me in sending our best to you."
Nixon had been a member of the House Un-American Activities Committee whose hearings had shaken Hollywood to its core in 1947, with Hopper serving as a primary cheerleader. They were devout coreligionists in the fight against the social decay represented by Communism, not to mention unche
... weniger
Autoren-Porträt von Scott Eyman
Scott Eyman has written acclaimed biographies of Mary Pickford and Ernst Lubitsch, as well as the film history THE SPEED OF SOUND: HOLLYWOOD AND THE TALKIE REVOLUTION.
Bibliographische Angaben
- Autor: Scott Eyman
- 2023, 432 Seiten, Maße: 15,8 x 23,4 cm, Gebunden, Englisch
- Verlag: Simon & Schuster US
- ISBN-10: 1982176350
- ISBN-13: 9781982176358
- Erscheinungsdatum: 09.11.2023
Sprache:
Englisch
Pressezitat
"Better than any other biographer that has gone before, Eyman gets underneath Chaplin and explains that complex personality." San Francisco Chronicle
Kommentar zu "Charlie Chaplin vs. America"
Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar zu "Charlie Chaplin vs. America".
Kommentar verfassen