Government Communications and the Crisis of Trust / Progress in Mathematics (PDF)

The fascinating "Government Communications and the Crisis of Trust» shows how the British civil service information machine has evolved from WW2, taking the Iraq War, Brexit and latterly the coronavirus pandemic, as case studies. Garland identifies the arrival of 24/7 media and the rise of special advisers as main drivers of the blurring of boundaries between impartial and partisan communication; a journey from 'political spin' to 'post-truth' that over time has undermined public trust. This interesting and highly relevant book is a must read for all political science and political communication scholars.

-Kristoffer Kolltveit, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo - kristoffer.kolltveit@stv.uio.no

Understanding the decline of public trust, and the extent public perceive governments as manipulating them, is an important area of study and the with a backdrop of anti-elitism that emerged inthe UK to culminate in Brexit is an excellent case study. Garland's work highlights how communicating for public good has become secondary to gaining and maintaining power. Offering a route map to reasserting public good, the work should be compulsory reading for anyone entering the world of political communication

-Professor Darren G. Lilleker (Bournemouth University) - DLilleker@bournemouth.ac.uk

"This is an excellent book on the age of political spin in the UK from the beginning of the Thatcher administration to the current post-Brexit government of Boris Johnson. The book is highly readable, theoretically informed and underpinned by rigorous empirical research. Ruth Garland's study of government communication uses elite interviews, archival and documentary sources to shine a light on the struggles, alliances and rivalries characterising the relationships between the media, civil servants, special advisers and the political class atthe heart of British democracy. Her work draws attention to dangers inherent in the response to the processes of mediatisation by the main political actors during a period of profound change to the political communication practices and the constitutional architecture of the UK."

-Ian Somerville, Head of School of Media, Communication and Sociology, University of Leicester